Ram Manohar Lohia - the English and Independence

Bharatbhai R Pandya Acp updated his status.

24 May 2017 at 21:25 · 

Dedicated to Munawwar Hussain.The thinking of great leader Ram Manohar Lohia ran parallel to yours as regards Independence of 1947.Hope you will be able to read this samagri. Yours is the Idealistic Theory but the Congress leaders were not motivated by that idealism but were eager to maintain supremacy of Bradman ism whose great apostle was Gandhi. They looked on with eyes on practical politics and here India and Pakistan fell to the Brahmin tricks and the result is before all to see.
--------------'''''--------''''''''''-'

#राममनोहर_लोहिया अपनी किताब, "हिन्दू बनाम हिन्दू" में लिखते हैं.......

"मैं दावे के साथ कह सकता हूँ, अंग्रेजों के समय का गुलामी काल, शूद्रो(sc,st,obc) के लिये वरदान साबित हुआ है. हम प्राचीन काल की चाहे जितनी भी डींग हांक लें, लेकिन अगर अँग्रेजों का सम्पर्क न हुआ होता, तो हम बहुत पिछड़े रहते! भारतीय इतिहास के पांच हजार सालों में एक भी विद्वान शूद्रों में न हो सका, जबकि अँग्रेजों के लगभग 200 साल के गुलामी काल में डाक्टर अम्बेडकर, मेघनाथ साहा, राधा विनोद पाल, सुरेन्द्र नाथ शील और अन्य कितने ही नाम जिन्हें मैं नहीं जानता, शूद्रों(sc,st,obc) समाज मे निर्माण हुये उसका श्रेय अंग्रेजो को ज्याता है क्योकि ब्राम्हणो ने इनको एज्युकेशन से वंचित रखा था परंतु अंग्रेजो ने इनके लिए स्कूल सुरू किये इसके कारण अंग्रेजो से ब्राम्हण नफरत करने लगे थे ये कहकर की हमने बनाये नियमो का अंग्रेज उल्लंघन कर रहे है, हमारे धार्मिक बातो मे अंग्रेज हस्तक्षेप करने लगे है! क्या अपने धर्म के किसी विशिष्ट वर्ग को शिक्षा से वंचित रखना, उनपर अमानविय अत्याचार करना क्या धर्म हो सकता है? . यदि 1857 का विद्रोह सफल हो जाता तो निश्चय ही शूद्रो (sc,st,obc) को सामाजिक उत्थान के इतने अवसर न मिलते, जितने की 1857 के बाद अंग्रेजों की गुलामी काल में मिले हैं! *यह अंग्रेजों की गुलामी का काल था, जब एक ब्राह्मण चपरासी बना तथा चमार एक कलेक्टर."* और यही बाते ब्राम्हनो को काटे की तरह चुभने लगी थी और आज भी चुभती ह

इस देश का मूल शासक ब्राह्मण ये खूब जानता था कि अंग्रेज अौर 50 साल रह गये तो शूद्र(sc,st,obc) सत्ता मे अौर हम सत्ता के बहार हो जायेंगे क्योकि इनकी आबादी लगभग देश मे 85% परसेंट है और हम ब्राम्हनो की केवल 3.5 % परसेंट इसलिए ब्राह्मणों ने अंग्रेज को भगाने का आंदोलन राष्ट्रवाद की आड मे चलाया था। और देश के शुद्रो को आपस मे जाती धर्म के नाम पर लडवाकर उनको कभी आपस मे एक नही होने दिया ताकि तोडो, फोडो और राज करो यह उनकी कुटनिती सफल हो सके!

Share

Bharatbhai R Pandya Acp

24 May 2017 at 06:19 · 

A post from Munawwar Hussain
--------- being honest and upfront were not the only qualities needed to build a successful nation, my driver is very honest man, can we make him PM?... Jinnah failed to realize that his people were not competent enough to run a country, Brits were developing the country's infrastructure, they had all the technology to build whole India much better than what we did after 1947, these leaders stopped that development and prosperity for 400 million people, which could have made lives of the masses much better, imagine if it had continued till 2000, we would have been even better than Canada or Australia

2 Comments

4Nilesh Hedamba, Munawwar Hussain and 2 others

Share

Exercise with Dance

https://www.facebook.com/bharatbhai.r.pandya/videos/10209463847428090/https://www.facebook.com/bharatbhai.r.pandya/videos/10209463847428090/

Sola hat for Horse Riders

This hat is called " Sola Hat "
.It was a must for the horse riders for protection of head against fall from the horse back.I had to wear it. The Britishers were No 1 buyers of such hats as it protected the head and major part of body under the sun shine.In Bombat , there was one special shop named " Calcutta Sola Hat Agency " near Metro Cinema on Mangaldas Road and it sold items of police uniforms including horse riding ok .I was a regular visitor to this Store .When I had no byke in 1971/72 ,I used bicycle but invariably put on this sola hat during day time. Unluckily I have no photo of mine wearing this hat.

Adopt the Question " Why ? "

Which law says judges can’t hold press conferences?

J CHELAMESWAR 

20 mins ago

Supreme Court judge Justice Jasti Chelameswar during a book launch 'Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India' |PTI

Full text of Justice J. Chelameswar’s speech at a felicitation function organised by Lawyers Collective in New Delhi on 18 May, his last working day.

Ihave been a student of Constitutional law for the past 40 years. I just believed in democratic values. And today, apart from the theory which I studied, I’m convinced that these democratic liberties only belong to the bold and vigilant people… timid do not have the liberties even if they are granted by somebody… It is in the hands of you people, the younger generation and your own ideals, your own vision of what kind of India you want to live in.

… I wouldn’t wish to really blame anybody. It’s (that) the systems are such.

One-crore-a-day lawyers don’t open their mouths

It was pointed out in the last about a year and a half of whatever I had undertaken to democratize the institution. It was the younger generation that stood by me. The establishment, constitution lawyers, jurists attacked me from every side.

Personally I don’t want to offend or hurt anybody, not because I’m afraid of anybody, but out of culture I don’t like too…

The one-crore-a day lawyers, they haven’t opened their mouths, they don’t take a stand. Look here something is going wrong, it should be questioned. Something is bad, it should be destroyed.

I believe… I don’t have anything personal against anybody in the system. And I stood up for certain issues and values. I raised questions.

There is a 20th century writer in my mother tongue, my mother tongue is Telugu. (Tripuraneni) Gopichand. He wrote very prolifically. One of his books is dedicated to his father who himself was a writer of great reputation. Apart from being a revolution and while dedicating that book, he wrote… that’s been translated… ‘To my father who taught me the question why, I dedicate this book’. I think it is that question. A lot of people have said what is that law, what is the scripture.

I knew I’d have to go through all this…I wasn’t innocent

Judges don’t hold press conference to deliver judgments. I know how literally Ms. (senior advocate Indira) Jaising was critical of my Rajbala judgment (December 2015). I might be right, I might be wrong, maybe she is wrong. Point is, so long as criticism is academic, based on some functions, there is nothing wrong with it. Maybe something can happen about it. Once you start attacking personally, it is also wrong…what is the end is a different matter.

Where is the law that says judges cannot hold press conferences? They shouldn’t do it to defend their judgments… I knew that when I opened my mouth, I would have to go through all this and I was willing to take it. I was not innocent. I was not ignorant about this. I was ready to take it.

Any questioning will not be taken kindly

In September 2016, when I wrote the first letter to the then Chief Justice that I would not attend the collegium meetings henceforth, I remember a member of the bar council came to the coffee room and (during) some discussion the then Chief Justice said you invited this. I said I am ready to take the consequences. I am not shirking my responsibilities.

The systems are such that any questioning will not be taken kindly. You’re required to have that courage, determination to take on the system if you want a good change.

Remember every fight is not necessarily good. If you are convinced the fight needs to be carried on is for a good change, please go ahead. A lot of people in this country will support you. A few will even speak out, not many speak out… (but) there are people.

‘Please speak up now’

I tell you, in the last six months, there are a lot of people in this country who have walked up to me and said, ‘we are happy that you did it’. They said pleasant things. Would they have spoken otherwise?

What troubles me is this. Former judges of the high court, former judges of the Supreme Court, former Chief Justices calling me saying – brother we wish you all the strength. I said, ‘Sir, please speak up now’. And…we have a former chief justice who wished to be anonymous. Others have no opinion.

I have no problem. But most of you who have an opinion and still wish to remain anonymous… then I’ll agree with you, I’m democratic (in) that sense. I don’t have a problem if you don’t agree with me, but if you have an opinion, speak up. That’s what’s troubling this country.

And I think it is in the hands of the younger generation to take on the thing… whatever is possible I will continue my service to this country. But I wish to say, some young lawyer came up to me and said, “I was planning to get out of the country and after the 12 January press conference, I decided to stay back and fight. I have 15-20 friends of mine and all of us were thinking of getting out of this country. But now we are staying back. Not because it’s good for me, it’s good for this country.”

If people (are) trying to return to this country, it’s good for the country and the situation. And that’s what I request each one of you – whether you are members of the bar or members of the society.

I am grateful for all the support from the younger generation and I know how many youngsters have supported me in the last one year. I am grateful to them and I wish each and every one of you all the best and I wish you all strength and a bright future on whatever path you choose.

Thank you.

Tags: Chef Justice of IndiaIndia Habitat CentreJ. ChelameswarRajbala judgment